Clyde
Omega Wolf
Posts: 9
|
Post by Clyde on Aug 28, 2008 2:53:28 GMT -5
I saw a trailer in televison tonight for the new sequal to 30 Days of Night and immediately got ecstatic because I loved the novel and the first movie. As I surfed the net looking for news about the flick I came across the film on youtube. Surely this can not be the actual film, but it surely looks like the trailer I saw on TV. I could have swore that the ad said now in theatres.
|
|
Clyde
Omega Wolf
Posts: 9
|
Post by Clyde on Aug 28, 2008 3:09:46 GMT -5
OK sorry for the overexxageration, 4am tv surfing can play tricks. 30 Days of Night:Dust to Dust is some series running on fear.net. I'm flat out pissed because I was excited to see a sequal to the original not 6 five minute online episodes. Oh well...
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcus on Aug 28, 2008 6:37:50 GMT -5
Shame, but I'd not expect a sequal until next year.
|
|
|
|
Post by ArcLight on Aug 28, 2008 10:43:16 GMT -5
I watched a few of them on Fearnet....not quite as boring as the movie but still good for a quick nap.....
|
|
|
|
Post by Werewolf on Aug 29, 2008 15:54:36 GMT -5
God it was boring wasn't it!
|
|
|
|
Post by dedwyre on Sept 6, 2008 15:52:48 GMT -5
"30 Days of Night" is currently available on one of the movie channels' on demand services. I liked the graphic novel, so I might as well watch the film while it's free. I would've seen it in theaters, but reviews from people on this board kind of turned me off to it.
|
|
|
|
Post by werewolves on Sept 24, 2008 20:26:40 GMT -5
Well...
I must admit, it was a little bit weird, but by no means was it boring. I especialy liked the "extreemly un-romantic" vamps. I mean, for Christ's sake, they friggin' hissed! And the fight scene at the end was my favorite part.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcus on Sept 25, 2008 3:17:47 GMT -5
I didn't find it boring either. I just felt certain aspects of it failed to deliver the right feeling, at least for me.
|
|
|
|
Post by dedwyre on Sept 25, 2008 17:03:18 GMT -5
I should watch this when it shows up on Starz, HBO, or whichever of those channels puts it on. I think its on our "on demand" gimmick.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcus on Sept 26, 2008 3:32:32 GMT -5
This would have been much much better as a mini-series rather than a film.
The film simply wasn't long enough to give the feeling of the passage of time that the story covers.
|
|
|
|
Post by ArcLight on Sept 26, 2008 11:08:34 GMT -5
Well... I must admit, it was a little bit weird, but by no means was it boring. I especialy liked the "extreemly un-romantic" vamps. I mean, for Christ's sake, they friggin' hissed! And the fight scene at the end was my favorite part. Yeah, the vamps looked great. That's what made me want to see it. But they were only around for like fifteen minutes and half of that time they spent just standing around waiting for someone to stick their head out. The other nine hours was just people I didn't care about ducking behind things and whispering. (what..? it wasn't nine hours long? sure felt like it.....) |
|
|
|
Post by Werewolf on Sept 26, 2008 15:50:01 GMT -5
I agree with arclight. Whilst it was nice to see vampires who were not like Anne Rice's Vampires (I love her books) I found it very hard to give a stuff about anyone in the movie and i hated the ending, but then i do tend to hate endings i consider sad with the exception of the the Descent
|
|
|
|
Post by dedwyre on Sept 26, 2008 23:26:17 GMT -5
I liked the ending when I read the graphic novel. I presume it's no different here.
|
|
|
|
Post by werewolves on Oct 2, 2008 17:48:15 GMT -5
What was the ending in the graphic novel?
|
|
|
|
Post by dedwyre on Oct 3, 2008 23:38:14 GMT -5
The main character cop with the funny name used vampire blood to turn himself into a vampire and killed the other vampires, then sat with his wife as the sun rose and he disintegrated.
|
|
