|
Botched
Sept 17, 2008 10:23:19 GMT -5
Post by Marcus on Sept 17, 2008 10:23:19 GMT -5
A horror Comedy that sounded pretty good, and the cover had a decapitated man with lots of blood on the floor and the trolly and the lift, so thought I'd buy it Synopsis: When a thief with zero luck screws up one heist, he finds himself sent over to Russia to even things out. But when that gig also turns sour, things go from miserable, to horrible, to downright supernatural in a bloodsucking, flesh-eating zombie kind of way.
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 18, 2008 13:27:47 GMT -5
Post by dedwyre on Sept 18, 2008 13:27:47 GMT -5
The British version must have a different cover. The cover I've seen has a guy tied to a chair who has fallen over, and the floor's wet, but it doesn't look like blood. Same plot, though.
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 21, 2008 6:36:03 GMT -5
Post by Werewolf on Sept 21, 2008 6:36:03 GMT -5
Well what's it like?
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 24, 2008 9:11:36 GMT -5
Post by Marcus on Sept 24, 2008 9:11:36 GMT -5
Got the film now, and can see the cover in better detail. It has a man tied to a chair that's tipped over, like the one that dedwyre mentioned, but he's definatly beheaded, as his head is on the other side of the picture, and there's blood on the walls, floor, lift doors. Guess they taimed it down for you americans
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 25, 2008 6:00:50 GMT -5
Post by Marcus on Sept 25, 2008 6:00:50 GMT -5
Watched this last night It was pretty good in an odd way. The humour took a little to get into, but once I did found it pretty funny To me the film got funnier the more it went on and you saw more of the character's personalities showing through. It has a small part played by the Sergant from Dog Soldiers - so yay! And it has several other people most will recognise (like the artist girl form the lastest season of Dexter), though I cannot think of their names at the moment. There were no blood thirsty, flesh eating zombies in it - which is odd that the films synopsis mentions such. But I can say they were not missed the villian in it were more than adequate in making a mess. No idea how this got to be a 15 rather than an 18 rating. Probably because of the humour involved in the scenes. The style of the film worked well for it, and it didn't have that Glossy feel a lot of hollywood films do. Wasn't keen on a lot of the background music - sounded disjointed and slightly irritating. But not enough to spoil the film. So if you like slightly odd characters, humour, and gore than this film is worth watching.
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 25, 2008 17:02:02 GMT -5
Post by dedwyre on Sept 25, 2008 17:02:02 GMT -5
Got the film now, and can see the cover in better detail. It has a man tied to a chair that's tipped over, like the one that dedwyre mentioned, but he's definatly beheaded, as his head is on the other side of the picture, and there's blood on the walls, floor, lift doors. Guess they taimed it down for you americans Odd. I figured blood was edited in Europe and sex was edited in North America.
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 26, 2008 3:30:36 GMT -5
Post by Marcus on Sept 26, 2008 3:30:36 GMT -5
Our UK Censor board has got pretty relaxed in the last few years. You have to have a pretty extreme film these days for it to get an 18 rating. Most modern horror get released with a 15 rating.
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 26, 2008 15:38:51 GMT -5
Post by Werewolf on Sept 26, 2008 15:38:51 GMT -5
True. Our censors are letting a lot more few these days. Isn't it strange that they mention flesh eating zombies yets there's none in the movie. When i read the synposis for Sahara it said there were zombies in there too so i was expecting them flee from hoards infected people. NOTHING! Just a few funny looking people ill!
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 26, 2008 23:28:58 GMT -5
Post by dedwyre on Sept 26, 2008 23:28:58 GMT -5
So the term "zombie" is being used very loosely in film descriptions as a way of enticing potential viewers? Next there's going to be a movie that advertises werewolves but features a regular dude who howls for five seconds and then gets shot.
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 27, 2008 3:48:52 GMT -5
Post by Marcus on Sept 27, 2008 3:48:52 GMT -5
It is strange. False advertising, tut tut.
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 29, 2008 14:51:07 GMT -5
Post by Werewolf on Sept 29, 2008 14:51:07 GMT -5
If they feel the film is that bad they have to pretend there are zombies in it perhaps they should have added some in the first place or don't release it!
|
|
|
Botched
Sept 30, 2008 3:48:26 GMT -5
Post by Marcus on Sept 30, 2008 3:48:26 GMT -5
Perhaps whoever wrote the blurb didn't read the script properly.
|
|