|
|
Post by swf on Aug 31, 2010 16:04:30 GMT -5
I've been debating on getting this flick for some time, but don't know if it's any good. Fangoria covered it, and the photo of the "werewolf" they ran didn't look bad, if not a bit "odd" looking. So, has anyone seen this flick, and is it worth adding to my collection?
|
|
|
|
Post by keywolf on Aug 31, 2010 16:40:13 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by swf on Aug 31, 2010 17:42:05 GMT -5
Okay, just read it, still wanna see it, though. From what I've read, the werewolf effects suffered because of the movies low budget. I think that was insinuated in the Fangoria article. Either that, or I read it somewhere on the web. Can't rightly remember.
Is there any kind of transformation sequence?
|
|
|
|
Post by Moonreaper on Aug 31, 2010 20:17:28 GMT -5
I like it, though the werewolves looked a tad laim the story and atmosphere were great. Its not the best but it is enjoyable and as for movie the threads I could do it, but I think it would be better to re-post them and start fresh.
|
|
Ian
Pack Member
"Even a man who is pure in heart..."
Posts: 100
|
Post by Ian on Sept 1, 2010 3:26:05 GMT -5
I would say it is worth watching. I don't remember there being a transformation sequence. In the making of documentary you see the clay sculpture/model of the werewolf and it actually looks quite good but once they added the fur all the detail was lost. That is why Len Wiseman had hairless werewolves in the first Underworld film. Here was my brief Amazon review: ""Wild Country" is a recent Scottish werewolf film. The story/scenario was a bit too simple and the werewolves looked like Ardvarks/Anteaters."
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcus on Sept 1, 2010 4:03:05 GMT -5
The werewolves didn't look good close up, but at a distance, like when they see one moving on the hillside it looks interesting, rather liked the back leg configuration.
It does look like a low budget film. But the story works, and I'd say it is a watchable film. Just don't pay too much for it.
|
|
|
|
Post by ArcLight on Sept 1, 2010 12:50:04 GMT -5
I remember thinking it was a decent little movie. If I'm keeping my werewolf movies straight in my head, the werewolf would've worked better without some broad daylight close-ups.
|
|
|
|
Post by swf on Sept 1, 2010 13:54:51 GMT -5
Now, check this out. Here's the region 1 DVD cover art compared to the more cool region 2 DVD cover. Which one would you buy? Yup, that's right. The region 2 cover art is way more enticing. So far, though, I still haven't heard anything that would put me off from buying this.   |
|
|
|
Post by Moonreaper on Sept 1, 2010 18:01:58 GMT -5
Eh I like them both, but this is a prime example of how region 1 and 2 box arts can be different.
|
|
Ian
Pack Member
"Even a man who is pure in heart..."
Posts: 100
|
Post by Ian on Sept 2, 2010 10:18:58 GMT -5
|
|
|
|
Post by Moonreaper on Sept 2, 2010 17:18:01 GMT -5
HA it is, wow that great.
|
|
|
|
Post by Marcus on Sept 3, 2010 3:53:17 GMT -5
I like the 1st image more than the 2nd one. The 2nd image's claws and ripe marks don't look that great to me. The 2nd image is the one I have on my DVD of this film.
|
|
|
|
Post by Moonreaper on Sept 5, 2010 9:07:16 GMT -5
Yea i lean more towards the first one as well.
|
|
|
|
Post by necrodemon on Sept 13, 2010 19:50:05 GMT -5
Never saw this one. It looked lame. Should I even bother? You guys now my taste. It's gotta be brutal.
|
|
|
|
Post by Moonreaper on Sept 14, 2010 18:25:02 GMT -5
Eh, not that brutal but it sure aint disney either.
|
|
