|
Post by someoldguy on Jan 11, 2020 22:11:40 GMT -5
It was with some trepidation that I decided to watch this film. When the book came out in the early 1960s, I fell in love with it. I have re-read it several times since then. IMO it is Shirley Jackson's masterwork, even edging out The Haunting of Hill House. I was afraid of what filmmakers might do to it. The good news is that they made a terrific movie out of it. There is no bad news. Whether it is horror is merely a matter of definition. Do not expect monsters and gore and things like that. It is quite disturbing without any of those trappings. My fear was based on two issues. Would they follow the book? And would they keep it all from Merricat's viewpoint, an essential element to the story. The film stays very close to the book in plot, even in small details. And it is all about what Merricat experiences and feels and thinks. All well done and all in the context of fine production values, direction, camera work etc. Acting is all up to snuff and exactly as the book requires, with a top notch performance from Taissa Farmiga as Merricat. Farmiga is not afraid to do the entire role - and she is almost always on camera - without makeup, in pigtails and with a rather clunky wardrobe. But that is part of being Merricat. Another attention getting performance is Crispin Glover, master of the offbeat role, as the wheelchair bound and not quite balanced Uncle Julian who is obsessed with the multiple murders of six years prior. Glad I broke down and gave it a watch.
|
|
|
Post by ArcLight on Jan 11, 2020 22:13:32 GMT -5
Glad I broke down and gave it a watch. Good to hear. I've been wondering about giving it a go, myself.
|
|
|
Post by someoldguy on Jan 11, 2020 22:20:09 GMT -5
Glad I broke down and gave it a watch. Good to hear. I've been wondering about giving it a go, myself. I recommend you do so. But again it is not traditional horror, so do not expect anything like that. It is about how Merricat sees the world and she is ... different.
|
|
|
Post by ArcLight on Jan 11, 2020 23:20:09 GMT -5
Good to hear. I've been wondering about giving it a go, myself. I recommend you do so. But again it is not traditional horror, so do not expect anything like that. It is about how Merricat sees the world and she is ... different. I read the book during my 'Jackson phase' in high school (along with THE HAUNTING OF HILL HOUSE - of course - and THE SUNDIAL and LIFE AMONG THE SAVAGES and some other stuff) so I'll be good with it.
|
|
|
Post by someoldguy on Jan 12, 2020 8:44:44 GMT -5
I recommend you do so. But again it is not traditional horror, so do not expect anything like that. It is about how Merricat sees the world and she is ... different. I read the book during my 'Jackson phase' in high school (along with THE HAUNTING OF HILL HOUSE - of course - and THE SUNDIAL and LIFE AMONG THE SAVAGES and some other stuff) so I'll be good with it. Life Among the Savages and The Road Through the Wall are IMO Jackson putting her 'real' life in perspective and metaphorically putting that aside to get on with her 'real' writing career. In her next works ( Hangsaman and The Bird’s Nest) we can see Jackson developing her signature theme of characters living in an internal world. This is developed further in The Sundial as well as the other roots of The Haunting of Hill House and We Have Always Lived in the Castle, namely, that the sometime narrator in House and the exclusive narrator in Castle are not sane and that the house itself in all three is itself a sort of character. (I could go on about Jackson never really having shed her early life at home with her parents, but enough.) Since this site is about movies, not books, I will now cease and desist.
|
|